History / From the archive

A War Historian Left Room for Corrections

William H. Amerine’s 1919 introduction tells readers where his account came from—and invites them to add to it.

Editorial illustration: A pen correcting a notebook beside a World War I helmet and an imagined French landscape.
AI-generated editorial illustration. A pen correcting a notebook beside a World War I helmet and an imagined French landscape. Conceptual artwork, not a documentary image or a reconstruction of the reported event.

William H. Amerine did not introduce Alabama’s Own in France as a detached final verdict on the war. In the opening pages of his 1919 book, he described limited time for gathering notes, reliance on soldiers’ accounts, and an audience of people close to the men. He also acknowledged that errors would be found. [1]

The author explains his position

Amerine connects the project to a request for a regimental history and describes his work with the American Red Cross in Germany. A reproduced authorization in the front matter identifies him as the historian delegated by the 167th U.S. Infantry. The book is closely attached to the organization whose story it tells. [1]

His foreword distinguishes his collection of stories from the fuller work he expected later researchers to undertake in official archives. He says he uses soldiers’ accounts as well as newspaper and magazine material. These admissions give a reader a guide to the kinds of evidence—and loyalties—shaping the book. [1]

An invitation in the margin of the historical record

On printed page 3, Amerine explains that the volume includes documents, rosters, and citations he could obtain, and that space would be available for readers’ pen or pencil notes. His brief invitation, “Corrections are in order,” makes the possibility of revision explicit. [1]

That does not mean every assertion in the book has been corrected or independently verified. It means the author himself gives readers reasons to compare his narrative with other records rather than treating its confidence as sufficient proof.

Start with the foreword, then test the narrative

The foreword’s praise of the regiment is emphatic. Its account of how the history was assembled is just as important for understanding the source. A reader can value its proximity to participants while distinguishing recollection, quotation, official documentation, and patriotic judgment.

Crypt of Echoes preserves the full 490-page scan. The opening authorization and foreword provide a useful first stop before moving to a battle narrative or a name in the roster. [1]

Sources & archive records

  1. Alabama's Own in France (1919)

    William H. Amerine, Alabama’s Own in France (1919), front-matter authorization and foreword, especially printed pp. 1–3. Complete volume preserved.

    Original publisher or repository

Keep the conversation honest. Questions about a fact or a source? Request a correction. Read our editorial standards.

Search the coast.

Search happens on your device. Press Escape to close.